Re: Intel v. Hamidi


To CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
From "Eric C. Grimm" <ericgrimm@SPRINTMAIL.COM>
Date Sat, 1 May 1999 15:55:35 -0400
Importance Normal
In-Reply-To <Pine.SOL.3.95.990501143248.4803C-100000@comp >
Reply-To Law & Policy of Computer Communications <CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM>
Sender Law & Policy of Computer Communications <CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM>

fixes.  The noun and the modifier should agree in number.

Suitably off-subject?  I'd be eager to see the thread return to the
subject of law from a detour into that of personality.

-----Original Message-----
From: Law & Policy of Computer Communications
[mailto:CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM]On Behalf Of Mac Norton
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 1999 3:43 PM
To: CYBERIA-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: Intel v. Hamidi

I'm no French scholar, but is that "fixes" or "fixe"?  In any case,
what never ceases to amaze me is how these threads can take such sharp
turns away from the original subject when folks with agenda
(read: axes
to grind) get involved. :)  To the fixated, it seems, every subject
is relevant to their fixation.
MacN


Partial thread listing:
Re: Intel v. Hamidi, (continued)